Bright Minds, Bold Futures: The Power of Early Literacy and Education
Jumpstart for Young Children, my host organization, envisions a future where every child in the United States enters kindergarten ready for success. When I first joined Jumpstart I had a limited understanding of this vision. While I recognized the importance of kindergarten readiness within the educational continuum, I viewed early childhood education as just one part of a larger framework. Since becoming acclimated to the nuances of early childhood development as a fellow at Jumpstart, it’s become clear to me that not only is early childhood education arguably the most important stage of schooling, but it’s also staggeringly unequal in the United States—the implications of this are innumerable. I want to use this blog post to explain the Jumpstart “theory of change,” because I don’t think that the subtlety of early education as a policy issue is as broadly understood as it should be. By drawing awareness, I hope to inspire the passion that will motivate engagement and mobilize solutions.
I am grateful for the privilege to help operationalize Jumpstart’s vision and I am committed to continuing to advocate for policies that champion these goals.
By early education, I refer particularly to the schooling that young children receive between the ages of 0 to 5, or before they enter kindergarten. Neuroscience research indicates that this period is actually when the majority of brain development occurs, with 80% of the brain developed by age 3, and about 90% developed by age 5 (Grindal et al. 2012). Correspondingly, early experiences—including engagement with caregivers, language exposure, and environmental simulation—have a profound influence on brain architecture, and actually establish foundations for learning, behavior, and health. This means that the pre-school years are some of the most vital in affecting long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. These outcomes are important—in fact, they are so substantial that they are a proven determinant of the academic, behavioral, and economic outcomes that will follow throughout a young child’s life.
Research demonstrates that children who receive high-quality early childhood education are more likely to graduate from high school, pursue higher education, and secure stable employment in adulthood. These benefits spill into social welfare outcomes as well, with macroeconomic research suggesting that early learning programs can yield economic and social benefits such as reduced crime rates and increased workforce productivity. In fact, the National Bureau of Economic Research estimates that investments in high-quality childcare and early learning programs can generate up to $7.30 for every dollar invested. The impact of early education deficits can also be observed. A 2021 study by the National Institute for Early Education Research finds that children without access to high-quality early childhood education programs are 25% more likely to drop out of school and 60% more likely to never attend college. It’s, therefore, conceivable that the opportunity gaps that follow underserved children into adulthood are often rooted in disparities that emerged before they even started formal schooling.
Children from affluent families are more likely to attend preschool programs that offer enriching experiences, developmentally stimulating environments, and supportive relationships with trained educators. In contrast, children from low-income families are less likely to enroll in preschool, and more likely to receive lower-quality programming. Research by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) reports that these inequalities in early education are primarily a consequence of accumulated social and economic disadvantage, with socioeconomic status being the single largest predictor of gaps in early education (Garcia 2015). Moreover, racial gaps are primarily a result of the factors with race mediates. Data from the National Center for Education Statistics provides that the average quality of early education programs that Black children attend is lower than that of programs attended by White, non-Hispanic children. Correspondingly, Black children are, on average, about nine months behind in math and seven months behind in reading by the time they enter kindergarten compared to their White, non-Hispanic peers (Friedman-Krauss 2016).
Unequal exposure to high-quality early childhood education in the US can be attributed to a number of factors. For one, the United States is currently experiencing what many have coined a childcare crisis, marked by a national shortage of early care and education providers and a lack of access to affordable care. It is also the case that the Early Education system in the United States is inadequately funded, making it vulnerable to quality and accessibility limitations. According to an analysis by The New York Times of OECD data from 2021, the United States spends approximately $500 annually per child for early childhood care, significantly lower than the average of over $14,000 spent by OECD countries. These factors underscore the critical need for a reevaluation of funding and support mechanisms necessary to bridge the gap in early childhood education quality and access across the United States.
Jumpstart’s mission (not to be confused with its vision) is to ameliorate the starting gap for young children by compensating for some of these funding limitations. More specifically, Jumpstart provides high-quality early education programming by recruiting and training college students to deliver an early literacy and social-emotional curriculum in underserved preschools. The theory of change is this: by providing high-quality early learning programming, we can close achievement gaps before they happen. Simultaneously, by recruiting and training college students, we can target the supply-side difficulties that prevent working parents from accessing high-quality affordable early education and care. Through these combined efforts, more children can receive the early support necessary for long-term academic and personal success.
While Jumpstart’s programs create a substantial impact in many vulnerable communities, its scale is not nearly extensive enough to reform the status of early education in the United States. Addressing early education disparities requires comprehensive, systemic reforms to ensure equitable funding and support across all communities—this means sustained policy changes that tackle the root causes of barriers to funding and accessibility on a national scale. In sharing this perspective, I hope I’ve highlighted two key points: (1) early education is really important, and (2) the early education system in the United States is critically flawed. Addressing these challenges is crucial if we are to ever lean toward egalitarianism. I am grateful for the privilege to help operationalize Jumpstart’s vision and I am committed to continuing to advocate for policies that champion these goals.
Additional Works Cited:
Friedman-Krauss, A. (2016). How much can high-quality universal pre-K reduce achievement gaps?. Center for American Progress.
Garcia, E. (2015). Inequalities at the Starting Gate: Cognitive and Noncognitive Skills Gaps between 2010-2011 Kindergarten Classmates. Report. Economic Policy Institute.
Grindal, T. A., Hinton, C., & Shonkoff, J. P. (2012). The science of early childhood development. Defending childhood: Keeping the promise of early education, 13.
Sabrina Abreu
Sabrina (she/her) is the Program Operations & External Affairs FAO Schwarz Fellow Jumpstart in New York City.
SHARE THIS STORY